The financial analysis that Ford conducted on the Pinto concluded that it was not cost-efficient to add an $11 per car cost in order to correct a flaw. Benefits derived from spending this amount of money were estimated to be $49.5 million. This estimate assumed that each death, which could be avoided, would be worth $200,000, that each major burn injury that could be avoided would be worth $67,000 and that an average repair cost of $700 per car involved in a rear end accident would be avoided. It further assumed that there would be 2,100 burned vehicles, 180 serious burn injuries, and 180 burn deaths in making this calculation. When the unit cost was spread out over the number of cars and light trucks which would be affected by the design change, at a cost of $11 per vehicle, the cost was calculated to be $137 million, much greater then the $49.5 million benefit. These figures, which describe the fatalities and injuries, are false. All independent experts estimate that for each person who dies by an auto fire, many more are left with charred hands, faces and limbs. This means that Ford’s 1:1 death to injury ratio is inaccurate and the costs for Ford’s settlements would have been much closer to the cost of implementing a solution to the problem. However, Ford’s "cost-benefit analysis," which places a dollar value on human life, said it wasn't profitable to make any changes to the car. 01 ford ranger light relay location DO YOU HAVE A FAVORITE DAYTONA MOMENT? .4 amp batery drain ford taurus
.
The debut new st will take place together with other version focus - compartment - êàáðèîëåò.ñóïåðêàð c6rs. 0-60 mph ford 350 drw The Pinto disasters that were taking place did not go unnoticed by the government. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) began investigating the case shortly after the Pinto started rolling off the assembly line. The NHTSA contracted with several independent research groups to study auto fires from around the country. The studies took months, which was just what Ford wanted. The results were worse than anyone could have imagined. Robert Nathan and Associates, a Washington research firm, found that 400,000 cars were burning up every year, burning more than 3,000 people to death. Furthermore, auto fires were increasing five times as fast as building fires. Another study showed that 35 per cent of all fire deaths in the U.S. occurred in automobiles. Forty per cent of all fire department calls in the 1960s were to vehicle fires—a public cost of $350 million a year, a figure that, incidentally, never shows up in cost-benefit analyses. Also a report was prepared for NHTSA by consultant Eugene Trisko entitled "A National Survey of Motor Vehicle Fires." His report indicates that the Ford Motor Company makes 24 per cent of the cars on the American road, yet these cars account for 42 per cent of the collision-ruptured fuel tanks. Another staggering fact that was discovered was that a large and growing number of corpses taken from burned cars involved in rear-end crashes contained no cuts, bruises or broken bones. They clearly would have survived the accident unharmed if the cars had not caught fire. 0 financing on ford
02 ford 150 xlt intakes 01 ford ranger In an interior of changes also a little: furnish of interior is modernized, the central console has received the button of start of the engine, such details as the electrosocket 230V and a jack for connection of headphones have appeared. 01 ford f150 rear axle 02 ford expidition suspension WAS YOUR PERFORMANCE TODAY AND IN TESTING A CARRY OVER FROM LAST YEAR IN THE TESTING YOU WERE ABLE TO CONDUCT? “We’re running the same race car that we used in Talladega last year. The whole team went to Las Vegas and tested. I think we were third overall and it’s all because of Ford. They’ve done a lot for us. They jumped in and helped us out on a lot of things and the seven-post time, you name it. They helped us. We’ve been digging as hard as we have been since the second half of last season and we started to get some help from Ford and it made all the difference. We picked up two- to three-tenths and even a half of second everywhere we went because of the Blue Oval, not because of anything we were doing.00 ford gt mustang The automobile differs new headlights and to aggressive lobbies áàìïåðîì. Back lanterns became light-emitting diode. 01 ford f150 rear axle First of all, appeal of hotel consists in its{her} site. As against such hotel of Saint Petersburg as Astoria or October, located directly in city centre, Baltic is on coast of gulf of Finland. On the one hand to inhabitants of hotel the water horizon of a gulf opens, with another the kind from apart on domes Èñààêèåâñêîãî of a cathedral opens.02 ford explorer won't start clicking 00983 ford |
00725 ford 0 interest rates offered by ford Find ford and more at the lowest possible price! |
00 ford f150 towing 02 ford escape auto parts
“Everybody remembers their very first time here, but the novelty wears off just a bit when you’ve been here as long as I have. Anytime you can start the year off at a place like Daytona it’s fun. Trust me, there was a time earlier this year that I didn’t think I was going to be here, but I’m really excited to be here now. 01 ford escort 0-60 times for ford explorer 0 ford extended cab truck 01 ford ranger extended cab subwoofer 00 ford mustang brake troubleshooting 02 ford expl shift interlock solenoid
02 ford f-150 xlt wheels It is interesting to note that the Pinto disaster almost never occurred. In pre-production planning, engineers seriously considered using in the Pinto the same kind of gas tank Ford uses in the Capri. The Capri tank rides over the rear axle and differential housing. It has been so successful in over 50 crash tests that Ford used it in its Experimental Safety Vehicle, which withstood rear-end impacts of 60 mph. Why didn’t Ford use such a gas tank? When asked about the Pinto gas tank, a Ford engineer admitted: "That's all true (The fact that the car tends to explode in minor accidents). But you miss the point entirely. You see, safety isn't the issue, trunk space is. You have no idea how stiff the competition is over trunk space. Do you realise that if we put a Capri-type tank in the Pinto you could only get one set of golf clubs in the trunk?" 01 ford ranger clear corner In 1972 the NHTSA had been researching and analysing auto fire causes for four years. During that time, nearly 9,000 people burned to death in flaming wrecks. Tens of thousands more were badly burned and scarred for life. And the four-year delay meant that well over 10 million new unsafe vehicles went on the road, vehicles that will be crashing, leaking fuel and incinerating people well into the 1980s. 01 03 ford f-150 supercrew tailgate 01 ford expedition keeps blowing fuse That the holiday has passed really perfectly, we should be present on it{him} as organizers. If we become organizers of your action it{he} remain in your memory on all life! Day by day îïëà÷èâàíèå different services by means of Webmoney there is all more actually. In mad rate of today's city we simply do not have time to drive to the provider of these or those services, on a mail, in the Savings Bank.. $50.00 ford test drive |
$50 ford test drive 00 ford thunderbird |
0-60 2003 ford mustang svt cobra 02 ford escape reviews 01 ford kona Excellent 2.5L a turbo the engine with five cylinders and capacity 225 has h.p. remained constant. The automobile is accelerated up to 100 km/h approximately for 6,5 seconds.01 ford ranger review C6RS It was initially created in the single copy under the order known òåëåâåäóùåãî Äæåÿ Ëåíî (Jay Leno). However has been solved to let out{release} the automobile in the limited circulation in 25 copies, and cost of "transformation" base Z06 in C6RS, without taking into account the price itself Corvette later, will make more than 185 thousand dollars. 00 ford f350 tailgate 02 ford explorer sport aftermarket parts
02 ford expedition “I don’t know if it will be tighter racing, but as far as the drivers being comfortable in their race cars and being able to catch you and pass you without worrying about getting loose, it’s going to be better Updated óíèâåðñàë Focus it will be submitted in the beginning of the next year. 01 ford f150 rear differential price | 00 ford mustang owners manual
|
| In an interior of changes also a little: furnish of interior is modernized, the central console has received the button of start of the engine, such details as the electrosocket 230V and a jack for connection of headphones have appeared..
As well as usual lancer, new "ten" is longer, wider and higher than the predecessor. the roof, forward wings and a back rear wing are made of aluminium - evo x all on 25 kg it is heavier than the predecessor. at the new machine the centre of gravity is lower (because of other configuration and other units), ðàçâåñîâêà on axes has a little improved: forward ñâåñ now on 20 mm is shorter, and the accumulator and áà÷îê a washer have moved to a luggage carrier. and the main thing - a new body on 40 % is more rigid on torsion and on 60 % - on a bend, rather than a body of a former lancer in farewell version evolution ix mr. The financial analysis that Ford conducted on the Pinto concluded that it was not cost-efficient to add an $11 per car cost in order to correct a flaw. Benefits derived from spending this amount of money were estimated to be $49.5 million. This estimate assumed that each death, which could be avoided, would be worth $200,000, that each major burn injury that could be avoided would be worth $67,000 and that an average repair cost of $700 per car involved in a rear end accident would be avoided. It further assumed that there would be 2,100 burned vehicles, 180 serious burn injuries, and 180 burn deaths in making this calculation. When the unit cost was spread out over the number of cars and light trucks which would be affected by the design change, at a cost of $11 per vehicle, the cost was calculated to be $137 million, much greater then the $49.5 million benefit. These figures, which describe the fatalities and injuries, are false. All independent experts estimate that for each person who dies by an auto fire, many more are left with charred hands, faces and limbs. This means that Ford’s 1:1 death to injury ratio is inaccurate and the costs for Ford’s settlements would have been much closer to the cost of implementing a solution to the problem. However, Ford’s "cost-benefit analysis," which places a dollar value on human life, said it wasn't profitable to make any changes to the car..
01 ford kona |
|
|